What does arouses NYT mean in the article?

[AnnisHayma]

I’m trying to understand the meaning of arouses NYT as mentioned in the article. Can someone explain the context and why the author used it? Any insights would be really helpful!

 

[GaleGaytan]

In the NYT articles, the arouses term also implies to arouse, cause or arouse some interest, emotion, suspicion, or curiosity, not necessarily of a physical or sexual nature.

 

[EarlHardim]

In the context of an article, “arouses NYT” usually refers to the word “arouses” being used in a piece published by The New York Times. Arouses, in this case, usually refers to the act of provoking, stimulating or evoking a very strong response or emotion. As an illustration, when the article states that a policy or an event is controversial, or is interesting, it implies that, it is something that causes controversy, or interest, or passion among people.

 

[charlesrich]

In an article, arouses NYT refers to the use of the word “arouses” in a New York Times article. Generally, it implies the provocation or the stimulation of a response. An example of this is that a story can be arousing, that is, it can stimulate concern or arouse curiosity that is, it produces or generates interest in the readers. The NYT section merely represents the source and does not have an exclusive meaning of the word.

 

[advikwid]

When you see arouses NYT, it points to the verb arouses as used in a New York Times article. Arouses refers to to excite or rouse feelings or reactions. The report might be an example of arousing debate or arousing anger, indicating that it causes people to discuss or feel. The expression does not use any special jargon meaning, it is simply a way of using standard English in the context of the NYT.

 

[WalterWah]

The term arouses NYT in an article context highlights the use of “arouses” by The New York Times. It is in most cases an act of stimulating interest, excitement or high response. As an example, the phrase “arouses controversy" denotes that a thing is a matter of controversy. The NYT source merely demonstrates the publication in the use of the term; the word itself is used normally, meaning how a subject or phenomenon arouses emotional or attention.

 

[Bpiogantro]

In articles, arouses NYT is just a reference to the word “arouses” as it appears in a New York Times piece. To arouse is to incite, to excite or to provoke something, e.g. curiosity, anger or argument. As an example, a movie can be reported as stirring up strong opinion, i.e. evoking the reaction of a reader. The NYT component merely recognizes the source of the use.